my primary objection to the primals thing is that most questions could be answered yes or no depending on framing. is the world 'safe'? i am fairly confident i won't die of violence, but even more confident that i will die of *something* within the next century. i don't think asking me this gets at fundamental aspects of my worldview, because neither answer feels very relevant either way
(the only questions i found relatively unambiguous were like 'everything happens for a reason' stuff. not coincidentally, i think, those were the ones where i was very distinct from the average, i expect because i did not need to hedge those by picking middle-of-the-pack 'i slightly disagree because there is no 'this question is meaningless' button' options)
no subject
(the only questions i found relatively unambiguous were like 'everything happens for a reason' stuff. not coincidentally, i think, those were the ones where i was very distinct from the average, i expect because i did not need to hedge those by picking middle-of-the-pack 'i slightly disagree because there is no 'this question is meaningless' button' options)