feotakahari: (Default)
feotakahari ([personal profile] feotakahari) wrote2023-02-08 02:17 pm

(no subject)

To clarify some of my other takes: I don’t believe there’s a meaningful distinction between things that are part of “nature” and things that are not part of “nature.” The closest you can get is “things that either exist or can theoretically exist” vs. “things that can’t possibly exist,” and the more you dig into that, the farther afield it gets from how people typically use the word “nature.”

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting