entanglingbriars: (Default)
Dove ([personal profile] entanglingbriars) wrote in [personal profile] feotakahari 2019-09-24 01:19 am (UTC)

The Conservapedia is correct that the woman caught in adultery appears to be a later revision, based the existence of early manuscripts of John that don't contain it, but afaik Schlafly is nearly unique in thinking that it ought to be purged or that it doesn't represent Jesus' nature.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting