2022-09-07

feotakahari: (Default)
2022-09-07 12:36 am
Entry tags:

(no subject)

Incredibly weird in retrospect: there was a lot of Gamergate-adjacent contempt for game reviewers for allegedly being “bad at video games.” Setting aside what “bad at video games” even means, the only specific case I know of was when a business journalist was bad at Cuphead, and people kept calling him a “game reviewer” even though he didn’t review games. The rest of it was just free-floating assertions that there were unspecified game reviewers who were bad at unspecified games.
feotakahari: (Default)
2022-09-07 08:46 am
Entry tags:

(no subject)

Tumblr thinks that, because I reblog posts about how “narcissistic abuse” is a bullshit concept, I want to read a blog about “narcissistic abuse.” The person writing this blog is strikingly focused on their own perspective and acts like their view of a situation is the only view that matters. I’m going to chalk this one up to projection.
feotakahari: (Default)
2022-09-07 08:50 pm

(no subject)

As much as I love Arknights lore, my brain grinds to a halt whenever I remember that there are people who spend money on gacha. Fuck this entire business model.
feotakahari: (Default)
2022-09-07 09:23 pm
Entry tags:

(no subject)

A recurring story on Ask a Manager: “I work for a nonprofit that supports an important goal, but the executive director is a jackass who’s pissing away our money. What can I do to stop the whole organization from going under?”

I feel like, if people are giving money to your organization and it’s not doing its job, then people could just as easily give that money to a different organization that’s more effectual. So maybe you should let your dysfunctional nonprofit go under.