feotakahari: (Default)
2023-11-16 07:13 am
Entry tags:

(no subject)

Just read a body horror story about people turning into giant brains. Kinda missed me, because I’m not really scared of turning into a giant brain? I feel like it’s just another body type.

The whole story is blatantly queer and written for people to whom trans bodies are just more body types.

Apparently, I’m queerer than queer. I choose to count this as a win.
feotakahari: (Default)
2023-11-13 05:55 am
Entry tags:

Actual take I saw with my own eyes

“Disney is erasing queerness because they’re no longer making villains who are flamingly gay.”

Fuck, dude. Have some standards for what gay people get depicted as.
feotakahari: (Default)
2023-06-21 08:04 pm

(no subject)

Sure, “queer people aren’t trying to ‘recruit’ your kids” is a full sentence. But I think there’s a bit more nuance that can be put on it.

There’s a right-wing idea that queerness is contagious, like turning into a werewolf. But on the left, what we think is that some folks figure out they’re queer, and other folks figure out they’re not queer, and what they are doesn’t change, just how much they know about what they are. We’ve seen folks who had a miserable time trying to date women before realizing they’d rather date men, or who pushed themselves to date when they weren’t interested in romance at all, and our goal is to make it easier to avoid that. If you turn out to be straight and cis, all the more power to you! You know what you are because you had the chance to see what you’re not. If you’re bisexual, but you only date the opposite gender, that’s fine! We’re not trying to “fix” you. All we want is for people to understand themselves a little better.
feotakahari: (Default)
2023-05-30 03:43 pm
Entry tags:

(no subject)

I’m starting to see the appeal of calling yourself a faggot. I just read a post that argued that whenever queer exclusionists say bigoted stuff about nonbinary people, transmascs consistently misinterpret it as bigoted stuff about transmascs, so they get angry, but they don’t get angry in a way that’s helpful for the nonbinary people that are actually being discriminated against. I think this is an accurate description of what happens, and I can concede that nonbinary people are genuinely being wronged here. But at the same time, it’s not like the religious whackjobs who present the biggest threat to us all know or care about any of that. All of us are faggots to them, so our position as faggots matters so much more than our position as transmascs or nonbinary or whatever.
feotakahari: (Default)
2023-05-13 01:18 pm
Entry tags:

(no subject)

The fact I am an atheist is inextricably linked to the fact I’m queer.

The general fact that a person is an atheist, and the general fact that a person is queer, have no inextricable links to other facts.

The above two statements are linked.

There’s no gatekeeping for atheists. You don’t have to be an atheist the “right” way. Anyone who’s willing to proclaim that there are no gods is welcome. In the same way, you can be queer and never have to worry if you’re too gay to be bi or too bi to be gay. Queer is for everyone who’s ever been bitched at by people who think “asexual” isn’t a valid orientation or want you to clarify what “genderfluid” means. I choose the communities whose members choose themselves, and I’m proud to be there.
feotakahari: (Default)
2022-11-27 05:28 am

(no subject)

There’s this game, The Caligula Effect 2, that has a premise that would easily fit with genderqueer representation. It gives a whole bunch of options for what personal fantasy the main character is living out in virtual reality, but unfortunately, none of them are gender-related. I still thought of the main character as transfem, because fuck it, this is supposed to be a blank-slate self-insert character, and I’m inserting myself.

To my surprise, there turned out to be a canonical nonbinary party member, currently presenting as male, but unsure where he’d ultimately land. I talked to him about it, and he asked me if I would have treated him differently if I’d perceived him as female. I said no, because I figured transfem MC wouldn’t care. He thought I was lying and refused to ever speak to me again. I had to rewrite his memory to remove that conversation, then go back and say yes, I’d treat him differently.

That’s the most I’ve ever felt disconnected from one of these “self-insert” characters. Transfem MC would have found a way to explain what she meant.
feotakahari: (Default)
2020-02-19 04:04 pm
Entry tags:

Originally posted in response to a post by Polyfrazzlemented

I guess what I’m pushing at is that all the anti-capitalist stuff I see assumes the replacement for capitalism is closely linked tribal groups, and I tend to assume that the more linked people are, the more they’ll hate me for being different. I feel a lot safer in an environment where I’m valued for earning money, and will continue to be valued so long as the money comes in, than in an environment where the only thing protecting me is love, which can be conveniently discarded if someone doesn’t like that I’m queer.

WOW that’s so much more cynical and depressing than I thought I was capable of.
feotakahari: (Default)
2019-12-16 05:42 am
Entry tags:

(no subject)

I’ve never understood what it means when people say they’re “queer as in Magneto was right.” If I actually thought Magneto was right, I wouldn’t use the word “queer” in the first place. I mean, I don’t think cis gay people are inherently better-equipped to understand nonbinary identities than cis straight people are. And there are certainly individual gay people who are bigoted against everyone else under the “queer” umbrella. But the reason I use “queer” is because I think people who are different from each other are generally capable of understanding each other. I want to build alliances, and “queer” is a broad term with which to do that.
feotakahari: (Default)
2019-06-05 10:25 pm
Entry tags:

(no subject)

From another user’s deleted post that can no longer be reblogged:

“When we try frame our existence as once that needs to be justified or explained to cis women, we allow them to gradually build a narrative of themselves as a vulnerable group in comparison to us, when the reality shown by the experiences of so many trans feminine people is that trans women are, on every level, much more at danger in cis women’s presence than vice-versa. acting like we owe them something just allows them to further build up this narrative of themselves as the exploited group that gracefully allows us to exist due to the good of their hearts, rather than the reality that they’re an oppressor group that, like all oppressors group do, exploits and abuses us and only occasionally tolerates our presence in society.”

My original response to this post was unfair and mean-spirited, and for that I apologize. Instead, I want to explain where I’m coming from.

There’s this idea that’s spread around sometimes that “queer” is too broad of a term. If you can have queer sexuality, queer gender expression, and/or queer physical variance from the binaries of “male” and “female,” then basically anyone can claim to be queer if they want to be. The usual queer response is to try to set some boundaries, e.g. “het BDSM isn’t queer.” My response is “anyone can claim to be queer? That’s awesome!”

You can say that there are benefits to being a woman, or to being Native American. You can even say there are benefits to being poor, though I’d heavily disagree with that statement. But there’s no real benefit to calling yourself queer. Queer closes doors, but it’s not currently in a position to open them. That means if you call yourself queer, it’s because you want to be queer, and to find some solidarity with all of the other people who call themselves queer, too.

Queer is “anyone can wear the mask.” Queer is Let America Be America Again. Queer is looking at violence against gay men in Russia and Two-Spirits in Canada and finding empathy with both. Queer is a movement, and we’re always recruiting. All you need to do is care, and do what you can to help other queer people.

You can say that cis women oppress trans women, just as you can say that het trans women oppress bisexuals, or Caitlyn Jenner oppresses everyone. But I can’t help but think that this plays right into the hands of the people who think “wombyn” is a meaningful concept. I’d rather go the opposite direction. Take away “cis” and “trans” and just have “woman.” Take away “man” and “woman” and just have “person.” Let queerness sweep the planet until everyone is queer, and no one is, because we’ve developed enough empathy for different ways of being that a “queer” outgroup is no longer necessary.

Of course, this will inevitably end in a new outgroup of, IDK, otherkin or something. That’s when I’ll find a new term to express solidarity with otherkin. The struggle never ends!
feotakahari: (Default)
2019-05-29 09:17 am

(no subject)

Brian Aldiss has a story called “Becoming the Full Butterfly.” It’s about a transgender mystic who starts a movement of embracing the body you were meant to have. It’s very utopian in its view of a world where everyone has a single true self just waiting to be uncovered. It offended me, but not for the reason the author would have expected.

It didn’t seem like there was any room for genderfluid people in the author’s vision. There was no neutrois, or two-spirit, or butch for that matter. There were just the old two boxes, and new ways to fit people into them. And if neither box felt like you, it was because you hadn’t realized it yet.

I call myself queer because it’s a word that cannot be contained. It overflows its bounds, washing away boxes. Anyone can be queer, but queer doesn’t have to be anything. All it asks of you is to allow other people their chance to be queer too, in whatever form that takes for them.

P.S. I’ve seen those posts about how kinky people aren’t really queer and are trying to “steal” queerness. I don’t trust arguments made from disgust, and these posters keep coming back to the idea of kink as something socially unacceptable, “greasy” people do. Queer is as much a movement as an orientation, and I have no interest in making the tent smaller.