feotakahari: (Default)
Hot take: the reason almost every modern adaptation of The Island of Doctor Moreau does "people turning into warped animals" is that "animals turning into warped people" was a metaphor for "black people turning into warped white people." Modern stories assume the target audience isn't racist enough to be scared of that. (There's still The Album of Doctor Moreau, but that's the same joke as the lab-engineered boy band in Gravity Falls.)

Additional hot take: this is also why The Planet of the Apes doesn't hit anymore. If you read the original book, "apes rise up and overthrow humanity, but aren't smart enough to build a functional society" is blatantly "black people rise up and overthrow white people, but aren't smart enough to build a functional society."
feotakahari: (Default)

I played a shoot-em-up game called Huntdown where a lot of the people you kill are poor, black, or both. You could easily analyze the bigoted tropes it imports from the ‘80s movies it parodies. But I don’t think the devs intended to give a message about bigotry, or any message at all beyond “it’s fun to blow shit up.”

I played a different shoot-em-up game called Blue Estate that tries to be “offensive to everyone,” which really just means it’s offensive. There’s bigotry, mocking of bigotry, and bigoted mocking of bigotry. I found it unpleasant, but I don’t think the devs seriously intended for you to agree with the bigoted shit. It was just supposed to be ridiculous and silly.

Both of these games are “political,” but I think there’s a fundamental difference between them. And while I haven’t played a game that actively pushes racism, I think it would be fundamentally different from both.

feotakahari: (Default)

In the 2000s, I watched a movie where the main character’s son goes missing during a plane flight. She blames this on a man the movie refers to as “an Arab,” and he’s openly angry at the racism.

After she gets her son back (from a white guy), she and the Arabic guy share a look. I’m not great with facial expressions, but he didn’t seem angry, so I interpreted it as silent forgiveness. And I wondered if it was a white scriptwriter who wrote an Arabic person forgiving a white person for racism.

feotakahari: (Default)
Why would a billionaire be a Zionist anyway? They’re the people least likely to be affected by a pogrom.
feotakahari: (Default)
The super-psychics are called Errans, but I found a single lore entry calling them Aryans. I'm not sure if this is a spoiler, an autocorrect, or a red flag.
feotakahari: (Default)
Compared to the past, an employment field currently has a higher percentage of brown people and pays less.
The typical interpretation: “Employers found it easier to shortchange brown people, so higher-paid white people got laid off or otherwise forced out.”

Compared to the past, an employment field currently has a higher percentage of women and pays less.
The typical interpretation: “Men quit because they didn’t want to work jobs that had a lot of women. Men quitting made the field less respected, so now it’s underpaid to match men’s low opinion of women.”
feotakahari: (Default)
People like to say “haha, white supremacists are ugly!” But I think it’s more damning that white supremacists are people. I just saw a photo of a white supremacist leader, and he’s a perfectly ordinary-looking person I might have had as a coworker. You’re not a seven-foot-tall slab of muscle; what are you acting all superior for?
feotakahari: (Default)
Reading a Pathfinder fic, and it does a good job of establishing how tribalism, religious conflict, and totalitarian governments lead to some races being viewed as “the bad ones” despite none being inherently evil.

Reading the reference materials it links to, and this shit sounds obscenely racist. “This volume offers an indispensable analysis of the most vicious killers of all – orcs. Born and bred for war, they are an awful, brutish, violent species and, despite their constant infighting and backstabbing, their horde armies remain a dire threat to all races.”
feotakahari: (Default)
Person A: “These intersex women got insulted and called ‘men’ just because they were good at sports.”

Person B: “People are mad at trans women in sports even when those trans women are bad at sports.”

Person C: “Whether trans women should be banned from women’s sports isn’t determined by whether trans women are good at sports, and we shouldn’t argue based on the premise they’re bad or the premise they’re good.” (They didn’t say anything about intersex women, but I assume the same applies.)

I think C is arguing from the safest rhetorical position. Both A and B seem easy to undercut.

I’m partial to position D, but it’s a bit more granular than the others: “Black female athletes keep getting tested and determined to be intersex, while white female athletes who might be intersex aren’t forced to be tested. This is because racists already think black women are like men.”
feotakahari: (Default)
If you’re arguing about whether someone is a grifter or a believer in white supremacy, you need to pin down what “belief” means for a white supremacist. It’s apparently pretty nebulous.
feotakahari: (Default)
“Jews will not replace us” assumes continuity of self between parents and children, such that your children aren’t a replacement of you. This is false. Your children aren’t you, some Jewish person’s children aren’t you, and the only way for you not to be replaced is to live forever.

“Land back” assumes continuity of self between parents and children . . .
feotakahari: (Default)
On the one hand, this show is . . . probably racist? I really don't like what they're doing with the black best friend, to say nothing of the "ethnic" superheroes like the black disco dancers or the vain, flamboyant Latin American.

On the other hand, this show is the tone I want from superhero media, and after shit like Capes or Dispatch, I am willing to forgive a lot of sins as long as the superheroes aren't depressing.
feotakahari: (Default)
I have once again been called racist for saying I refuse to classify people as a “race.”
feotakahari: (Default)
Read an article about ten great black women in anime. I remembered Sister Krone, and I was surprised they could find ten black women in anime who weren’t stereotypes. Then Sister Krone was on the list. Talk about scraping the bottom of the barrel.
feotakahari: (Default)
I realize it’s pointless to apply logic to this person’s posts, but arguing “immigrants compete for resources in the U.S., which makes the U.S. worse” competes with “if they didn’t immigrate, they could work to make their home country better.” Why don’t they compete for resources in their home country, or why can’t they work to make the U.S. better?
feotakahari: (Default)
A lot of my thoughts on intent in fiction come down to You Don’t Fucking Know That.

There was this short cartoon called Lava where the two volcanoes in love with each other were modeled on the voice actors. People thought the male volcano was ugly, and they argued that this reinforced how fiction keeps pairing ugly men with pretty women. Then other people pointed out “no, the voice actor just looks that way.” The people who thought it was sexism Didn’t Fucking Know That.

And honestly, I seem to be really bad at Knowing That. I’ve been repeatedly informed that I completely misinterpreted what the author was trying to say. So unless something is, like, Turner Diaries level of obviously bigoted, I’d rather approach it in terms of the setting and characters. I can Know That about the story, even if I can’t Know That about the author.

You could call this willful ignorance, but to some extent it’s willful disrespect. If the author said something stupid, I don’t want to give them the dignity of acknowledging it. I just want to salvage what parts I can, because I think authors die best when they’re murdered. After all, “that is not dead which can eternal lie,” and I think modern authors have done a decent job of murdering Lovecraft.

This is why I keep referencing Zootopia, because it refuses to let you Know That. Most of the characters don’t consistently map to a single out-of-universe demographic (mafia stereotypes notwithstanding), so you usually have to take it from an in-universe perspective and evaluate it without considering what you already Know about some real-world issue. So obviously, Tumblr decided it was trying to be about anti-black racism, and judged it as a failure because it didn’t map to that. Even when I’m writing about something inspired by a real issue, I want it to be defined by the events within the story itself, because I think it’s better writing when you don’t want or expect readers to Know That.
feotakahari: (Default)
On a related note, I find it amusing that these white nationalists think people who're against white nationalism are "fascists" who're oppressing the white race. "Fascist" really is a content-free word.
feotakahari: (Default)
Just saw a person being xenophobic to immigrants on the grounds that “these people are more xenophobic than you.”
feotakahari: (Default)
Various magic systems have characters so obsessed with their false worldviews that they can overwrite the real world to match. Character who gets magical powers from his belief in immutable racial categories—

Wait, “Grand Wizard.”

Profile

feotakahari: (Default)
feotakahari

August 2026

S M T W T F S
      1
234 5 678
9101112 13 1415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031     

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Aug. 15th, 2026 03:39 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios