Mar. 15th, 2021

feotakahari: (Default)
I mostly argue against terrible anti arguments, because those are the ones I tend to see. If I was going to argue against coherent anti arguments, I’d use a sort of opposite to the slippery slope argument.

People used to argue that Mortal Kombat would train your brain to kill people. Now they don’t argue that. It wasn’t “disproven.” It simply fell out of fashion. I’m fine with that, since Mortal Kombat didn’t train my brain to kill people.

People argue that Gary Coleman/Macaulay Culkin underage RPF will train your brain to hurt people. I don’t have proof this is true or false. But there’s no logical reason it would have a different effect on your brain than Mortal Kombat. Either they both train your brain, or neither of them do.

Slippery slope would be that antis will want to ban Mortal Kombat. But they won’t. That argument is done with. I could easily get away with saying “fuck you, got mine!” and enjoy MK in peace. But I’m not comfortable with pretending I’m somehow morally superior to people whose interests are more cringe than mine. That’s what I mean by the opposite of slippery slope. I want to climb back up the slope to where everyone gets treated as decently as I do.
feotakahari: (Default)
Unfix-it fic idea for Persona 5: what happens if Ann kills Kamoshida?

Read more... )
feotakahari: (Default)
Smart AIs that destroy the planet are called super AIs. What about paperclip maximizers following simple rules without true intelligence? I propose we call them stupor AIs.

Profile

feotakahari: (Default)
feotakahari

June 2025

S M T W T F S
12345 6 7
8 910 11 121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 13th, 2025 09:27 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios