Sticky: An introduction to what Utilitarianism isn’t
Dec. 8th, 2018 07:10 pmAny blog should start off by introducing its subject, but in theory, Utilitarianism is quite simple. It’s a theory of ethics under which you should take whatever actions will lead to the greatest happiness for everyone involved. There are no other rules or restrictions–just make as many people as happy as you can make them.
So to make this more interesting, let’s go over some of the things Utilitarians DON’T have.( Read more... )
From a dream
Mar. 5th, 2026 07:29 pmShadow elementals belong to neither of these categories. They bear their name because they’re recognizably “of shadow” in the same way that light elementals are “of light,” and they can do things with shadows that parallel light magic. But shadow is the absence of the light element, not an element in itself, and the things shadow elementals do are fundamentally not magic. No one has an explanation for this, save perhaps the shadow elementals themselves, and they aren't telling.
I’m playing Esoteric Ebb
Mar. 4th, 2026 05:54 am(no subject)
Mar. 3rd, 2026 09:09 am(no subject)
Feb. 26th, 2026 12:52 amI read a fantasy novel where the main character breaks a giant metal chain and nearly decapitates their love interest with it. No one is actually harmed. This is a typical fantasy novel mistake.
I watched a military movie where the main character shoots some civilians he thinks are enemies. This is a typical military movie mistake.
I played a horror video game where the protagonist needs to cross a street, but no matter how long he waits, the cars never stop zooming past. He throws a dummy into the road so cars will stop. A driver swerves to avoid it, crashes into a lamppost, and dies.
Horror can have a main character who isn't even thinking about violence fuck up in a way that ends up with a body count.
(Okay, horror and also Tales of the Abyss. And tragedies like Romeo and Juliet, but tragedy as a genre is pretty much dead now.)
(no subject)
Feb. 25th, 2026 11:03 amIt amazes me that we've developed a way to assign new meanings to any word, and we use it solely to reference sex acts and genitals. Take the people who referred to the movie Pocahontas as "Poke Her Hontas." "Hontas" isn't even a word, and yet it's taken as a given that this sort of sentence is sexual. Plural* confirms that it means "poke her breasts." And you can do this with almost any noun or nonsense word!
Most of the time when I read a post by an asexual person who doesn't understand what was sexual about some statement, the statement in question is along the lines of "poke her hontas."
*It's unusual to see this sort of redefinition for testicles unless it's set up in advance.