feotakahari: (Default)
I think video games are actually the least immersive genre, and one of the multiple reasons for this is Game Overs. You fight a boss, learn a little of its patterns, and die. You fight it some more, learn a little more of its patterns, and die. Then you fight it again and win. But how did the character win, when winning involves patterns the character had no way to know in advance? The only way to make it work from an “immersed,” Watsonian perspective is to treat the battles as abstractions that only exist from the player’s perspective, things that didn’t “happen” in relation to the rest of the game’s universe. If you’re trying to create a consistent “reality” for things like fanfiction, the broad strokes of the battle still “happened,” but they didn’t and couldn’t happen exactly the way you played them.

(Disbelief is also affected by the illusion of choice, but this post is long enough.)
feotakahari: (Default)
I’ve figured out how to express my issue with Doylism--or at least, with what I think of when I think of Doylism. It’s the equal and opposite of why I got so sick of Danganronpa.

Danganronpa is very self-aware--sometimes overly so. It’s a series about sex and violence, and it expects you to be playing it because you want to see sex and violence. Sometimes it plays along and shows you out-of-nowhere fanservice as a “treat.” Other times, it guilts or mocks you for wanting what it’s offering.

Myself, I picked up Danganronpa because I really, really like Phoenix Wright, and I wanted to play something similar. I wasn’t particularly looking for fanservice or gore, so I just wanted it to shut up and get back to the mystery-solving.

My experience of how Doylism is practiced on sites like Anime Feminist is that it turns that same lens on creators instead of consumers. This character has large breasts? That’s because the creator wanted a large-breasted character, because the creator is a sex pervert. That character dies tragically? The creator must be bigoted about allowing such-and-such a group of people to survive their stories.

Meanwhile, you’ve got creators who have large breasts, or creators who modeled a character on someone they know who has large breasts, and I think there was one who said he built his character around looking like she’d give good hugs.

Now, you can say “I don’t care why the creator did it. I’m sick of all these large-breasted characters everywhere.” Or you can say “large breasts would be a hindrance in the sport this character is supposed to be good at.” Or you can say “how come nobody at all in this setting has small breasts? Small-breasted people exist too.” None of those are precisely Watsonian or Doylist, but they’re closer to Watsonian. They’re criticism of the story and its world, rather than trying to read the author’s mind.
feotakahari: (Default)
I complain sometimes about how feminist blogs tend to be Doylist beyond all reason, but it does have advantages over the uber-Watsonian approach of sites like TV Tropes. I read a feminist post today about some anime called Promare, then looked it up on TV Tropes to confirm it actually existed, because this is bananas. TV Tropes is capable of recognizing that the frost-themed villains are American-influenced and like to oppress minorities, but can only talk about this in reference to other anime, and can’t point to any reason why this story would be told in this way other than “other stories were told in similar ways.” Meanwhile, the feminist blog can clearly identify that this show is calling for the abolition of ICE.

Profile

feotakahari: (Default)
feotakahari

June 2025

S M T W T F S
12345 6 7
8 910 11 12 1314
15 16 17 18 19 2021
22 232425 26 27 28
29 30     

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 1st, 2025 07:37 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios