(no subject)

“People who write posts containing the phrase ‘owe me an essay on why it’s wrong’ don’t owe me an essay on why it’s wrong. In fact, they don’t owe me shit.”

“White people can reblog this, and they can add anything they want.”

“Nazis do interact. You might learn something about why you’re wrong. It would be pointless for me to post anti-Nazi stuff to be read solely by people who are already anti-Nazi.”

I dunno. Some ideas just don’t seem like they have the memetic fitness to spread and multiply, even if they’re strictly better than their opposites.

(no subject)

I had a math teacher who had an idiosyncratic definition of what it meant to “curve” a test. Whenever anyone asked him if he curved tests, he explained his definition of curve, then said he didn’t do that. People sometimes tried to get him to explain whether he curved tests according to the normal definition that regular people used, but he just explained his definition again.

This is what I think of when you say that your method of talking to spiritual or mystical entities isn’t a “religion.”