In which I’m politically incorrect

[feotakahari]

When straight guys say they want to be playthings for random women, they seem to forget that women they’re not attracted to could possibly exist. At other points, they say insulting things about specific women they don’t want to have sex with, so I think it’s some kind of doublethink.

When gay guys say they want to be playthings for random men, they do this mind-screw thing where the idea of being used sexually by an unattractive man is itself an attractive idea. (I’ve seen straight men use the mind screw exactly once, in a video game called Monster Girl Quest.)

I mostly see straight women who want to be playthings for one hot guy at a time, not a whole bunch of random guys.

I just saw a lesbian who wants to be a plaything for random women. I’m curious whether she can perceive women she’s not attracted to, but there’s no PC way to ask that.

Comments

[random_thought_depository]

"When straight guys say they want to be playthings for random women, they seem to forget that women they’re not attracted to could possibly exist." - I suspect male-typical attraction patterns are genuinely much more compatible with enjoying being a free use slut for people of the other gender than female-typical attraction patterns are. On a purely physical level I could probably enjoy sex with almost any adult woman who's younger than like 60 or so (and a lot of women older than that). If you made me have sex with randomly selected enthusiastically consenting adult women, I'd probably enjoy most of the sex I'd be having as part of that arrangement! And even sex with a woman I'm not physically attracted to might be kind of enjoyable if I could focus mostly on sensations (and I could probably do variations of that "being used sexually by an unattractive [wo]man is itself an attractive idea" thing in a lot of those situations). I suspect a lot of guys would feel getting to have sex with five or six women they're attracted to would be worth being made to have sex with one woman they're not attracted to, and that's approximately the ratio I'd expect for randomly selected women who'd be at least a little physically attractive to me vs. randomly selected women who'd be completely physically unattractive to me. Observing human society gives me a strong impression that what I've just described is much more similar to male-typical libido than female-typical libido, and I'm male, cis, and mostly attracted to women, and I think it would make sense for this to be a sex dimorphic trait in humans as a consequence of the different incentives faced by people who can get pregnant vs. people who can't and the selection pressures they'd exert. I guess a lot of guys who fantasize about being free use for women fantasize about an idealized version that removes things would realistically probably ruin it for them, but then that's how a lot of sexual fantasies work, including a lot of female sexual fantasies and a lot of MLM sexual fantasies.

"When straight guys say they want to be playthings for random women, they seem to forget that women they’re not attracted to could possibly exist. At other points, they say insulting things about specific women they don’t want to have sex with, so I think it’s some kind of doublethink." - Are you sure the guys who fantasize about being playthings for random women and the guys who make a habit of insulting women they aren't attracted to aren't different mostly non-overlapping groups of guys?